🔗 Share this article

Tbecame clear he endured defeat by lower-league opposition. Survive a decisive continental showpiece versus one of the worst Spurs sides in living memory. He withstood losing at home against domestic rivals, finishing 15th, the tactical inflexibility, undermining the team's most promising academy products, the 32% win rate, labeling the squad the worst the club has ever seen. But there was a single opponent with whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to tango. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, like many a top-flight defender in Blackburn’s title-winning 1994-95 season, the coach came at the executive and seems to have missed. The most casual observer will notice the paradoxical situation: a manager who frequently berated at his players for losing one-on-one duels succumbing in the face of the white heat and animal charisma of one of the Premier League’s most feared sporting directors.

In truth, this entire bruising episode seems to paint the director in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been easy, given his brief stint in a similar role with the Saints, to view Jason Wilcox as little more than a drudge within the club's structure: a man who owed his position largely to his friendship with his former boss Omar Berrada rather than any demonstrable skill. How mistaken everyone was. By masterfully outsmarting the club's celebrated manager, just as he bested the hapless Dan Ashworth before him, he has proved himself as one of football's strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect of which the club's competitors are now rightly wary.

The Strategic Clash Regarding System & Philosophy

To illustrate, this was Jason Wilcox who having been part of the leadership that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach in the first place, played a key role in trying to persuade Amorim to ditch his beloved 3-4-3. Naturally, these entreaties met a certain resistance. However, these judgements carry more weight when issued by a man of a man the unimpeachable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, holder of three England caps and a contributor to a championship team decades past.

Maybe eventually he might agree to explain his reasoning publicly. Maybe one day he might be asked why Amorim is departing with full compensation, with no penalty clause in place. The director speaks rarely in public, and with very good reason. The real thinkers of this sport – men like Jason Wilcox – simply operate at a level beyond our own prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, probably all we would hear is a series of high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Wanting is not quite the same as being prepared to receive.

An Supreme Authority In the Throne

But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the true genius behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, simply carrying out the directives of his line manager the billionaire owner, who privately has emphasized his desire for a four-man defense. According to reports, the owner has also proposed deploying the forward as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for the club to embrace analytics and metrics. Per reports, in an executive meeting early in his investment, he declared that the team's approach to football “shall be determined in this room”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is a specialist in this technical footballing stuff, leveraging his previous experience in industry and yachting. Above all he is immensely wealthy, and it is known, the rich are the best of us: more perceptive, more wise, more tactically astute, fundamentally better. Who else could one trust to manage a strategic plan of austerity, the construction of a modern arena that looks a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

A Modern Football Order: Directors Over Coaches

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent in top-tier football. Historically, clubs foolishly delegated major sporting choices to low-level employees like managers, talent spotters – even footballers. Perhaps it was once feasible for a young, innovative manager with ideas and drive to go into a club and implement their plan supported to fruition. But how many businesses have such individuals established? What number of large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Better by far to place the real power where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. It is wiser to decide the strategy in the boardroom and appoint someone who can tailor their offering accordingly. If coaches were once chefs, they are now more like Deliveroo drivers: not really creating the product, yet ultimately answerable should it be delivered poorly or fails to meet standards.

In the meantime, a coach's role is increasingly not about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the receptionist of the operation, the visible figurehead for a club they have minimal power to change. Enzo Maresca leads a team of very young players into the Champions League and wins two medium-sized trophies, and essentially gets sacked for talking. Wilfried Nancy sees his standing damaged while those individuals who hired him live to blunder indefinitely.

The Modern Corporate Game: Accountability Only for the Few

And possibly in a small way this represents corporate governance at work: the elevation of a privileged overclass who can never be wrong, whose choices are always untouchable, whose errors can always be sacked away without explanation. Appoint the system coach and then fire him for playing excessively that system. Bring in the process guy and later discard him for taking excessive time. And most importantly be grateful; for your modest season ticket price rises, for the latest player acquisitions, for the fact that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.